![]() All other Macs will be transitioned in the following years. A Mac Mini will probably also be released in the fall using the ARM chips. It will be unveiled at WWDC and be available in the fall as the first ARM-MacBook powered by the A10X-Chip together with macOS. That’s why we didn’t see an update to the MacBook 12” at the spring event. I also believe that macOS will be exclusive to Macs running ARM chips which will ultimately be the start of a transition to Apple Ax-powered Macs. ![]() A developer may only need to add some lines of code to its existing iOS apps to port it to the Mac running macOS. We saw with tvOS that Apple has implemented a Universal Purchase for apps, with macOS being based on iOS this would also be possible in the future. But I guess that it’s not too hard to take an existing iOS app and to port it to watchOS and tvOS. Correct me if I’m wrong, I’m not a developer. But under the hood, it runs iOS which has one big advantage for Apple: It has a huge developer community that is already familiar to code for iOS. Basically the same way that tvOS received a GUI and input method (Siri remote) to fit the needs for a TV operating system. I think it will even keep keyboard and mouse as input methods. I am not saying that we will have a stretched out iPad operating system on our future MacBooks, instead it will have an optimized GUI for desktop and notebook computers. They are all based on iOS which is clearly the more modern and newer operating system. My suggestion is that ‘macOS’ will be based on iOS which would make sense if we look at tvOS and watchOS. I really hope that this will not simply be a name change but instead a totally new operating system. Unfortunately, Google Analytics does not give any insight into the Mac OS X / macOS branding. Although such an arbitrary finding in no way guarantees that Apple is planning a naming switch, such a change makes sense given the naming conventions applied to the other operating systems.īy the way, we are seeing visits to 9to5Mac from ‘OS X 10.12’ slowly ramp over the last couple of months. Moreover, although a change in naming could be in the works, to bring OS X in line with the branding of Apple’s other operating systems, marketing decisions are unlikely to be shared with engineering this early in the cycle.Īpple’s annual developer conference, which is just a few months away, would be the most ideal setting for it to announce a rebranding of its venerable desktop OS. Remember that this file is only ever meant to be referenced internally, the macOS name is never exposed to the UI. Hence, developers often reference ‘macOS’ in one way or another, not necessarily linked to an upcoming rebranding. Developers often use macOS identifiers in filenames and code for convenience, as it offers a simple naming scheme for apps that span multiple Apple platforms (due to the symmetry of ‘macOS’ and ‘iOS’ suffixes). Unfortunately, this isn’t as conclusive as it first seems. Notice the “macOS” right before the filename extension. According to Rambo, this changed in OS X 10.11.4, which just launched publicly nine days ago. Specifically, the document is named FUFlightViewController_macOS.nib. At this point, OS X is the odd man out, but a recent finding indicates that a change might be in the works.īrazilian Apple blog MacMagazine points to the name used for an Interface Builder document buried deep within OS X’s System folder as evidence of a possible naming change.Įagle-eyed developer Guilherme Rambo found that an Interface Builder document under the amework in /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/ contained the macOS designation in its filename. We were able to verify Rambo’s findings, and spotted the macOS nomenclature located at the end of the document’s filename. Is OS X destined to be rebranded as macOS? Such a change wouldn’t at all be surprising, with iOS, watchOS, and tvOS already donning similar naming conventions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |